Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366738›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025

Inclusive methodological awareness for equity and diversity in biomedical research.

Elochukwu Ezenwankwo, Rosemary M Caron

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elochukwu EzenwankwoDrexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Nesbitt Hall, 3215 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. efe24@drexel.edu.
Rosemary M CaronMassachusetts General Hospital, Institute of Health Professions, School of Healthcare Leadership, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since publishing its first study, the Special Collection: Inclusive Methodological Awareness for Equity and Diversity has engaged a diverse audience in critically examining the broader question of equity and diversity in healthcare and biomedical research, notably the challenges and opportunities that shape this issue. A common thread that continued to crystallize was that achieving equity and diversity does not necessarily require new or groundbreaking methodologies but, instead, a deliberate, conscientious approach to planning, conducting, evaluating, and reporting research to ensure meaningful representation and a deeper understanding of the population(s) involved. This understanding was echoed in ongoing debates about how ethnic and racial categories are constructed, particularly in how clinical trials and causal inference research engage with these elements to understand and address disparities. It also extends to the discussions surrounding the design and implementation of more inclusive clinical trials, thus emphasizing the importance of recruitment and retention of historically underserved racial and ethnic minorities, as well as other socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. The work described in this collection further highlights the imperative of co-creating complex public health and healthcare interventions in partnership with affected communities. In this editorial, we reflect on these insights and notable recommendations that emerged. Clinical trial number: not applicable.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCultural DiversityHealth EquityResearch DesignClinical Trials as TopicDiversity, Equity, InclusionEthnicityHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMinority GroupsWorkforce DiversityDiversityEquityHealth disparitiesInclusiveMethodologyRace

Identifiers

PMID41366738
PMCPMC12687508

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.