Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366755›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

When to vaccinate for seasonal influenza: check the peak forecast.

Julie A Spencer, Manhong Z Smith, Dave Osthus, Prescott C Alexander, Sara Y Del Valle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julie A Spencer *Information Systems and Modeling Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Bikini Atoll Rd., Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA. jaspencer@lanl.gov.
Manhong Z Smith *Formerly Information Systems and Modeling Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Bikini Atoll Rd., Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Dave OsthusStatistical Sciences Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Bikini Atoll Rd., Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Prescott C AlexanderInformation Systems and Modeling Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Bikini Atoll Rd., Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Sara Y Del ValleGlobal Security Directorate, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Bikini Atoll Rd., Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.

Funding

Development of an Open-Source and Data-Driven Modeling Platform to Monitor and Forecast Disease ActivityR01GM130668 · NIGMS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI SANTILLANA, MAURICIO · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
Laboratory Directed Research and Development 20240066DRNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM130668NIH HHS R01GM130668-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeasonal influenza infects 5-20% of people every year in the United States, resulting in hospitalizations, deaths, and adverse economic impacts. To mitigate these impacts, influenza vaccines are developed and distributed annually; however, growing evidence suggests that vaccine effectiveness (VE) wanes over the course of a flu season. Delaying influenza vaccination for older adults has attracted attention as a potential public health strategy. However, given the uncertainties in seasonal peak, vaccine effectiveness, and waning rates, postponing vaccination could also lead to increased morbidity, motivating an evaluation of a range of potential scenarios. The aim of this study was to investigate favorable age group-specific vaccination schedules that could lead to the greatest disease burden reduction.

methodsWe systematically investigated a broad range of vaccination start times for five age groups under six combinations of initial effectiveness and waning rates, based on influenza cases and vaccine uptake data from 10 influenza seasons. We defined the most favorable vaccination schedule as the one that resulted in the greatest reduction in disease burden.

resultsIn scenarios with fast waning, all age groups benefit from delaying vaccination regardless of initial VE and peak timing. In scenarios with slower waning, results are mixed. For the ≥65 group, high initial VE and slow waning suggests that in early-peaking seasons, early vaccination most effectively reduces disease burden, while in late-peaking seasons delaying vaccination is most effective. For the ≥65 group in medium and low initial VE, and slow waning scenarios, delaying vaccination appears to prevent the greatest number of cases, regardless of whether the season peaks early or late.

conclusionThe most favorable vaccination schedule is sensitive to changes in initial VE, waning rate, and peak timing. Given estimates of these quantities from statistical and immunological models and observations, our methods can inform vaccination recommendations in order to most effectively reduce the annual disease burden caused by seasonal influenza. Specifically, accurate peak timing forecasts for the upcoming season have the potential to guide decisions on when to vaccinate.

Indexed as

Immunization ScheduleInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesVaccinationAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolForecastingHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedSeasonsInfluenza VaccinesInfluenzaInfluenza forecastingVaccineVaccine effectiveness (VE)VE waning

Identifiers

PMID41366755
PMCPMC12802129

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.