ArticleSystematic reviews2025
Comparative effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for knee osteoarthritis: protocol for a Bayesian Network meta-analysis.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundKnee osteoarthritis (KOA) is the most common and burdensome form of osteoarthritis worldwide. Although numerous non-pharmacological interventions are recommended in clinical practice, existing evidence remains fragmented and lacks comprehensive comparative evaluation. This study aims to systematically compare the effectiveness of first- and second-line non-pharmacological interventions recommended by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) for symptomatic KOA using Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA), which integrates both direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
methodsWe will conduct a systematic review and Bayesian NMA of randomized trials evaluating non-pharmacological interventions for symptomatic KOA. Eligible interventions include exercise, weight management, braces, and other guideline-recommended non-pharmacological therapies with strong or moderate evidence. The primary outcome is pain intensity, assessed using validated scales. Secondary outcomes include physical function, quality of life, stiffness, global assessment, and adverse events. A comprehensive search will be conducted across multiple databases without language restrictions from inception to the date of the formal search. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Bayesian NMA models will be implemented using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions will explore heterogeneity related to disease severity and treatment characteristics. Certainty of evidence will be assessed using the GRADE approach adapted for NMA.
conclusionsThis NMA will synthesize high-quality evidence on the comparative effectiveness of AAOS-recommended non-pharmacological interventions for KOA. The findings will provide clinically relevant treatment rankings, support individualized non-pharmacological management in adults, and inform future guideline updates and research priorities. SYSTEMATIC REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD420251045765.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.