Observational studyMedicine2025
Development and validation of a nomogram model for predicting in-hospital cardiac arrest risk: A prospective multi-center observational study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To construct and validate a prediction model for the risk of cardiac arrest (CA) in patients in the emergency resuscitation room. This prospective multi-center observational study enrolled 936 patients in the emergency resuscitation rooms of 6 Grade III Class A hospitals in Xinjiang from 12/01/2023 to 31/08/2023. After rigorous screening, 463 patients were included in the analysis. 324 patients were included in the modeling group for predicting the cardiac arrest, 139 patients were assigned to the validation group to evaluate the model. The modeling group was further divided into a Cardiac arrest group (n = 164) and a non-CA group (n = 160). Data analysis and modeling were performed, and the model was validated through various statistical and visualization methods, comparing its predictive performance with the Modified Early Warning Score. Five risk factors were ultimately identified, and a prediction model for the risk of cardiac arrest was constructed. The evaluation and validation results of the model showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of the modeling group was 0.957 (95% confidence Intervals (CI), 0.935-0.979), and the AUC of the validation group was 0.952 (95% CI, 0.921-0.993); the positive predictive value was 0.928, and the negative predictive value was 0.951. The HL test indicated χ²=12.800, P = 1.000, while the AUC of the modified early warning score scoring model was 0.621 (95% CI, 0.662, 0.580), P < .001. A cardiac arrest risk prediction model based on the neutrophil count, tracheal intubation, potassium, Lactate, and albumin have been successfully constructed. This model exhibits good accuracy, discrimination, and clinical practical value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.