ArticleMedicine2025
Identification of breast cancer susceptibility genes via trans-ethnic Mendelian randomization and colocalization analyses.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer remains a major global health burden, with persistent challenges including recurrence, metastasis, and drug resistance limiting the efficacy of current treatments. The identification of novel therapeutic targets is essential for advancing precision oncology. We employed a 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) framework utilizing large-scale eQTL and genome-wide association study (GWAS) datasets from European cohorts to identify genetic targets for breast cancer. Colocalization analysis, phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS), protein-protein interaction networks, and functional enrichment analyses (GO/KEGG) were conducted. Single-cell gene expression was also analyzed. Candidate drugs were predicted using pharmacogenomic databases and subsequently validated through molecular docking simulations. MR analysis identified 480 candidate targets, among which 51 were successfully validated. Colocalization analysis highlighted 7 genes - DNPH1, SYT11, RCCD1, LAMB2, SLC22A5, CBX6, and FAAH - with strong evidence of causal association. Functional annotation and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis revealed their involvement in key cancer-related pathways. Their expression patterns were also analyzed at the single-cell level. Molecular docking confirmed stable binding affinities between the identified target proteins and their predicted drug candidates. This integrative genomics and bioinformatics approach identified 7 promising drug targets for breast cancer. These findings offer novel avenues for the development of targeted therapies and underscore the importance of genetic epidemiology in guiding drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.