ArticleAlcohol, clinical & experimental research2026
Effects of COVID-19 economic impacts on alcohol use disorder symptoms are mediated by maximum and volume of alcohol intake: Data from the National Alcohol Survey's COVID Cohort.
Article in Alcohol, clinical & experimental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical implications of economic challenges and financial stress in addiction recovery: Strategies to inform clinical assessment and alcohol intervention.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDrinking patterns underlying the effects of COVID-19 economic impacts on alcohol use disorder (AUD) severity are poorly understood, yet critical for alcohol messaging during global crises. We examined whether the effects of COVID-19 economic impacts (CEIs) on AUD severity were mediated by drinking volume and/or maximum drinks.
methodsData are from the National Alcohol Survey's COVID Cohort, collected prepandemic in 2019-early 2020 (Wave 1), 2021 (Wave 2), and 2022 (Wave 3) using probability sampling via an online survey (n = 1062 across all waves). Past-year drinking volume categories were abstention and 7 drinking categories ranging from ≤1 drink/month to >4 drinks/day. Past-year drinking maximum categories were lifetime abstainers, former drinkers, <4/5 drinks (women/men), 4-7/5-7, 8-11, and 12+. AUD severity was classified as none (0-1 symptoms), mild (2-3), moderate (4-5), or severe (6+). CEIs were measured as the count of five economic hardship items (e.g., job loss and pay reduction). Path modeling examined direct and indirect effects of CEIs on AUD severity via drinking volume and maximum, separately, controlling for demographics and associations across key variables over time.
resultsCEIs predicted both drinking volume (p < 0.05) and maximum at Wave 2 (p < 0.01) and Wave 3 (each p < 0.05). In turn, both drinking variables at Wave 2 predicted AUD severity at Wave 2 (each p < 0.001), and at Wave 3 (each p < 0.001). Indirect effects via multiple pathways were statistically significant but precluded specifying lagged effects due to reduced model goodness of fit.
conclusionsFindings suggest people drank more and with higher intensity when facing pandemic-related economic hardships. Both maximum drinking and average volume increased concurrent AUD severity and mediated CEI effects. Health messages and policies targeting reductions in overall alcohol consumption and heavy episodic or high-intensity drinking during economic crises may mitigate the development of AUD symptoms among people experiencing negative economic impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.