Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41367090›Full record

ArticleClinical genetics2026

Fetal Fraction Signatures: A Quality Control Tool to Detect Potentially Confounding Situations in NonInvasive Prenatal Diagnosis of Monogenic Conditions.

Jean-Louis Blouin, Claudine Rieubland, Thierry Nouspikel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jean-Louis BlouinGenetic Medicine, Diagnostic Department, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Claudine RieublandDepartment of Medical Genetics, Central Institute of the Hospitals, Hospital of the Valais, Sion, Switzerland.
Thierry NouspikelGenetic Medicine, Diagnostic Department, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6650-9147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis relies on the analysis of the small amount of cell-free fetal DNA circulating in maternal plasma. Widely used to screen for chromosomal anomalies, the technique can also be applied to Mendelian diseases (NIPD-M). However, asserting the presence of a maternal variant in the fetus is challenging and requires the determination of the maternal haplotypes transmitted to the fetus. This is achieved via relative haplotype dosage (RHDO), a method that relies on the analysis of the allelic balance of multiple single-nucleotide polymorphisms around the pathogenic variant. An inherent risk of this method is that twin pregnancies and chromosomal anomalies like trisomy, monosomy or uniparental disomy unavoidably alter allelic balance, potentially leading to incorrect diagnosis. Here, we introduce an analytical method, fetal fraction signatures, that can detect such confounding situations in NIPD-M data, without the need for additional wet-lab work. We show that our method can reliably detect anomalies down to a low level of mosaicism and a low fetal fraction, thereby providing an essential quality-control tool for clinical testing by NIPD-M.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsGenetic Diseases, InbornNoninvasive Prenatal TestingPrenatal DiagnosisFemaleFetusHaplotypesHumansMosaicismPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePregnancyQuality ControlCell-Free Nucleic Acidscirculating cell‐free DNAfetal DNAmonogenic diseasenoninvasive prenatal diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID41367090
PMCPMC13066760

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.