ArticleHGG advances2026
Viewing direct-to-consumer genetic test results for depression risk is psychologically well tolerated: Evidence from a longitudinal equivalence study.
Article in HGG advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depression is a frequent focus of interest in genetic testing. Despite the growing availability of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for depression, little is known about the psychological impact of receiving them in real-world settings. To quantify the impact of receiving an at-risk depression PRS result on depression and anxiety symptoms, we conducted a longitudinal, prospective cohort study of 23andMe research participants. Eligible participants were US residents 18 years old and older who completed two surveys between October 19, 2022 and October 9, 2023 assessing depression and anxiety symptoms and who had an at-risk PRS for depression (odds ratio ≥1.5). We compared 361 individuals who viewed their result with 556 who did not. Primary outcomes were changes in depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-8) and anxiety (Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21) symptom scores relative to baseline. We fitted linear regressions to model each outcome, adjusting for age, sex, ancestry, income, prior depression and/or anxiety, and baseline scores. Using an equivalence testing framework, the smallest effect size of interest was defined as Cohen's d = ±0.5. Score changes from baseline to follow-up were statistically equivalent for individuals who viewed results and those who did not (adjusted between-group differences in score changes: depression, -0.17 points [90% confidence interval {CI} -0.59 to 0.24]; anxiety, -0.092 points [90% CI -0.35 to 0.17]; all p < 0.001). Results were consistent in substrata with or without prior depression or anxiety. We conclude that among genetically at-risk individuals, exposure to a depression PRS result was well tolerated in a real-world setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.