Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41367592›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2025

Development and validation of a stroke risk prediction model using regional healthcare big data and machine learning.

Yunxia Duan, Rui Wang, Yumei Sun, Wendi Zhu, Yi Li, Na Yu, Yu Zhu, Peng Shen, Hongyu Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yunxia DuanSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Rui WangSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yumei SunSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Wendi ZhuSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yi LiCenter for Medical Informatics, Institute for Advanced Clinical Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Na YuCenter for Medical Informatics, Institute for Advanced Clinical Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yu ZhuYinzhou District Health Bureau of Ningbo, Ningbo, China.
Peng ShenCenter for Disease Control and Prevention of Yinzhou District, Ningbo, China.
Hongyu SunSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to develop and validate a stroke risk prediction model based on machine learning (ML) and regional healthcare big data, and determine whether it may improve the prediction performance compared with the conventional Logistic Regression (LR) model. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the CHinese Electronic health Records Research in Yinzhou (CHERRY) (2015-2021). We included adults aged 18-75 from the platform who had established records before 2015. Individuals with pre-existing stroke, key data absence, or excessive missingness (>30 %) were excluded. Data on demographic, clinical measures, lifestyle factors, comorbidities, and family history of stroke were collected. Variable selection was performed in two stages: an initial screening via univariate analysis, followed by a prioritization of variables based on clinical relevance and actionability, with a focus on those that are modifiable. Stroke prediction models were developed using LR and four ML algorithms: Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN). The dataset was split 7:3 for training and validation sets. Performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration, and confusion matrices, and the cutoff value was determined by Youden's index to classify risk groups. Results: The study cohort comprised 92,172 participants with 436 incident stroke cases (incidence rate: 474/100,000 person-years). Ultimately, 13 predictor variables were included. RF achieved the highest accuracy (0.935), precision (0.923), sensitivity (recall: 0.947), and F1 score (0.935). Model evaluation demonstrated superior predictive performance of ML algorithms over conventional LR, with training/validation area under the curve (AUC)s of 0.777/0.779 (LR), 0.921/0.918 (BPNN), 0.988/0.980 (RF), 0.980/0.955 (DT), and 0.962/0.958 (XGBoost). Calibration analysis revealed a better fit for DT, LR and BPNN compared to RF and XGBoost model. Based on the optimal performance of the RF model, the ranking of factors in descending order of importance was: hypertension, age, diabetes, systolic blood pressure, waist, high-density lipoprotein Cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, physical activity, BMI, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, dietary habits, and family history of stroke. Using Youden's index as the optimal cutoff, the RF model stratified individuals into high-risk (>0.789) and low-risk (≤0.789) groups with robust discrimination. Conclusions: The ML-based prediction models demonstrated superior performance metrics compared to conventional LR and the RF is the optimal prediction model, providing an effective tool for risk stratification in primary stroke prevention in community settings.

Indexed as

Big dataMachine learningNursingPrediction modelStroke

Identifiers

PMID41367592
PMCPMC12684759

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.