Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41367748›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Sound touch viscosity imaging for chronic kidney disease staging: a novel biomarker for renal fibrosis.

Wei Zhu, Bin Ying, Xingyu Wang, Jianlian Pan, Xin Wang, Bin Xia, Rumei Li, Xiaojin Wu, Xiaolan Fu, Xinyue Zhu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Wei Zhu *Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, and International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Yiwu, China.
Bin Ying *Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, and International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Yiwu, China.
Xingyu WangDepartment of Ultrasound in Medicine, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, and International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Yiwu, China.
Jianlian PanDepartment of Clinical and Research, Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Xin WangDepartment of Ultrasound in Medicine, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, and International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Yiwu, China.
Bin XiaDepartment of Ultrasound in Medicine, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, and International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Yiwu, China.
Rumei LiDepartment of Ultrasound in Medicine, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, and International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Yiwu, China.
Xiaojin WuDepartment of Ultrasound in Medicine, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, and International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Yiwu, China.
Xiaolan FuDepartment of Ultrasound in Medicine, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, and International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Yiwu, China.
Xinyue ZhuDepartment of Ultrasound in Medicine, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, and International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Yiwu, China.
Luca ZanoliNephrology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Gino Pigatto FilhoDepartment of Urology, Hospital de Clínicas/Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Hong PanDepartment of Nephrology in Medicine, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, and International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Yiwu, China.
Jian ChenDepartment of Ultrasound in Medicine, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, and International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Yiwu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The accurate monitoring of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression is clinically challenging, as conventional shear wave elastography (SWE) only evaluates tissue stiffness by focusing solely on quantifying tissue elasticity, and this parameter is influenced by hemodynamic fluctuations. Sound touch viscosity imaging (STVi) addresses these limitations by simultaneously quantifying both elasticity and viscosity, providing a comprehensive biomechanical profile that better reflects the complex pathophysiology of CKD. This dual-parameter approach enables more reliable disease staging and progression monitoring. This study aimed to investigate whether STVi-derived viscosity parameters outperformed conventional elasticity measurements in CKD diagnosis and staging, establish clinically applicable cut-off values for viscosity to stratify CKD severity, and explore the pathophysiological correlation between viscoelastic properties and renal fibrosis. Methods: In total, 127 CKD patients [staged G1-G5 under the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria] and 84 healthy controls (HCs) were prospectively enrolled in this study. Ultrasound viscoelastic imaging was performed using Mindray Resona A20 systems with standardized protocols. Renal viscosity [pascal-seconds (Pa·s)] and elasticity (kPa) were measured simultaneously through Voigt model-based shear wave dispersion analysis. Histopathological correlation was established via image-guided biopsies. Results: The viscosity parameters showed superior diagnostic performance compared to the elasticity measurements. At the optimal cut-off value of 1.66 Pa·s, the area under the curve (AUC) for the right kidney was 0.95 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.92-0.99] (sensitivity 94.4%, specificity 96.2%). The viscosity values showed a strong correlation with pathological grading (Spearman's r=0.82, P<0.001) and displayed characteristic stage-dependent progression from G1 (1.71±0.11 Pa·s) to G5 (2.36±0.21 Pa·s), with a notable plateau observed between stages 4 and 5 (left kidney: P=0.87; right kidney: P=0.74). The bilateral consistency of the measurements (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.90) and the significantly higher diagnostic accuracy for detecting inflammatory changes (AUC 0.95 Conclusions: STVi imaging provides a novel, non-invasive biomarker for assessing renal fibrosis in CKD that outperforms conventional SWE. The established cut-off values and characteristic progression patterns offer clinically actionable thresholds for early detection and staging. Future multicenter studies should be conducted to validate these findings across diverse populations and etiologies.

Indexed as

Chronic kidney disease (CKD)fibrosisinflammationsound touch viscosity

Identifiers

PMID41367748
PMCPMC12682471

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.