ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Comparison of image quality in 40 keV virtual monoenergetic images of dual-energy CT pulmonary angiography using deep learning and iterative reconstruction algorithms under optimized low dose scanning protocols.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of 50-keV virtual monochromatic imaging combined with a personalized contrast agent protocol in computed tomography pulmonary angiography: a randomized controlled trial.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Clinical value of dual low-dose computed tomography angiography incorporating artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction for assessing arteriovenous fistulas/grafts among hemodialysis patients.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Dual-low spectral CT pulmonary angiography: a comparative study of image quality, radiation dose, and iodine intake with evaluation of pulmonary embolism detection.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary embolism is a potentially fatal cardiovascular condition that demands prompt and accurate diagnostic imaging. Traditional single-energy computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), while widely used, is associated with high radiation doses and substantial volumes of contrast agents, which may increase the risks of radiation-induced tissue damage and contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), respectively. Dual-energy CTPA (DE-CTPA) presents a promising alternative, though challenges, including elevated image noise at low kilo-electron volt (keV) levels (e.g., 40 keV), persist. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the image quality of 40 keV virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) reconstructed using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) algorithms within the context of low-dose DE-CTPA protocols. Methods: This prospective study enrolled patients who underwent DE-CTPA between January and April 2025. Using a Revolution CT scanner, 40 keV VMI were reconstructed with four distinct algorithms: ASIR-V 50%, ASIR-V 70%, Deep learning image reconstruction with medium setting (DLIR-M), and deep learning image reconstruction with high setting (DLIR-H). Iodixanol (350 mgI/mL) was administered at a dose of 0.4 mL/kg. The image quality was assessed through both objective measures [image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)] and subjective evaluation via a Likert scale. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 27.0, employing analysis of variance (ANOVA) for normally distributed data and the Kruskal-Wallis test for non-normally distributed data. Results: A total of 75 patients with clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism were included in the study. The mean effective dose (ED) was 3.76±1.02 mSv, with a mean CT volume dose index (CTDIvol) of 6.13±1.69 mGy and a mean dose-length product (DLP) of 221.12±59.85 mGy·cm. The mean contrast agent volume was 26.0±5.0 mL. Statistical analysis of image quality revealed significant differences between the four groups in terms of image noise, CNR, and SNR, measured at the levels of the main pulmonary artery, left pulmonary artery, and right pulmonary artery (P<0.001). Post-hoc analysis demonstrated that the DLIR-H algorithm provided the highest image quality, significantly reducing noise while enhancing CNR and SNR relative to both ASIR-V and DLIR-M (P<0.001). Compared with ASIR-V 50%, DLIR-H reduced image noise by 45% at the PA [24.25±16.18 Conclusions: The DLIR-H algorithm significantly enhances the image quality of 40 keV VMI images under low-dose DE-CTPA scanning protocols. It outperforms DLIR-M, ASIR-V 50%, and ASIR-V 70%, making it a promising tool for improving image quality in CTPA, particularly in clinical settings where minimizing radiation dose and contrast agent volume is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.