ArticleJAACAP open2025
Characterizing Transdiagnostic Processes Underlying the Drive to Socially Engage: A Multimeasurement Factor Analytic Investigation.
Article in JAACAP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are Differences in Social Drive in Childhood and Adolescence Diagnosis Specific? A Multimeasurement Subtyping Approach.JAACAP open · 2026Article
- Advancing scientific understanding of the drive to socially engage: from broad constructs to transdiagnostic 'building blocks'.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Review
- Dimensional phenotype measurement in children with rare genetic conditions: new insights into the aetiology of neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Parsing the heterogeneity of social motivation in autism.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2025Article
- A Critical Appraisal of the Measurement of Adaptive Social Communication Behaviors in the Behavioral Intervention Context.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Altered drive to socially engage is a transdiagnostic feature across multiple psychopathologies. Yet, lack of clarity regarding specific processes that constitute social drive, along with insufficient measurement methods, has hindered understanding in this area. This study ascertained the feasibility of approximating difficulties within specific fine-grained social drive processes as proposed by 2 theoretical frameworks: "orienting," "wanting," "pursuing," "liking," "learning," and "reticence" within a reward processing framework and "orienting," "seeking and maintaining," and "liking" within a social motivation framework. Method: Secondary data from the Healthy Brain Network were analyzed, comprising 2,663 participants (age range 5-21 years, mean [SD] age = 10.22 [3.38] year; 67% male) with diagnosed neurodevelopmental and/or neuropsychiatric conditions. Factor analyses used items from 7 caregiver-report questionnaires. Replicability of the factor solution was examined across different sex (male, female), age (≤12, >12), and diagnosis (autism, internalizing, other neurodevelopmental disorders) subsamples. Generalized additive modeling explored the association of identified social drive factors with IQ, age, sex, and diagnosis. Results: A 3-factor solution comprising social reticence, seeking, and maintaining factors provided the best fit to the data. The factor structure and item-factor loadings remained consistent across tested subsamples, with good-to-excellent internal consistency reliability. Factors showed differential associations with IQ, age, and sex. The autism subsample exhibited the most pronounced challenges, followed by internalizing and other neurodevelopmental disorders. Conclusion: A multi-instrument approach offers potential to capture difficulties within specific social drive processes beyond the capabilities of standard single-instrument scoring. However, the limited coverage of social orienting, wanting, liking, and learning processes within existing questionnaires underscores a need for future measurement development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.