ArticleBiomedical optics express2025
Pilot study: non-invasive binocular fundal pulsation measurements using infrared photorefraction.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Imaging of Tissue and Cell Dynamics: introduction to the feature issue.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Choroidal blood flow plays an important role in myopia development, and non-invasive techniques to measure both eyes simultaneously would be valuable. We explored the potential of infrared photorefraction to measure pulsation-related fundal reflectance changes. Tiny pulsation-related variations in pupil brightness were detected using custom-developed software written in Visual C++. Pupil brightness changes needed to be corrected for spontaneous fluctuations in pupil size. The software also included video eye tracking to verify that the same fundal location was measured. Two subjects (ages 27 and 70) were successfully measured. Pulsation amplitude was quantified as the absolute difference between the baseline and raw signal over time. Standard deviations from repeated measurements ranged from 6 to 10 percent. However, reasons for some residual variability in the traces have not yet been fully explained. Measurements had the advantages that hardware was cheap, easy to perform, in real-time, binocular, non-cycloplegic, and from a distance of 1.2 m. Some variability in the fundal reflectance traces still needs better understanding to make the technique suitable for clinical use.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.