ArticlePNAS nexus2025
Challenges in understanding and communicating the risk of zoonotic disease spillover from wild animal meat.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biocultural Ethnoecology ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Occupational Exposure and Economic Inequity Along a Game Meat Trade Network in Cross River State, Nigeria.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Discussions around managing hunting and the consumption of wild animal meat increasingly emphasizes public health concerns and the risk of zoonotic spillover. In this article, we explore factors that may lead to under- or overestimating health risks from wild meat and break down key terminology for a multidisciplinary audience. We outline key principles of disease ecology and epidemiology that are often overlooked when quantifying spillover risk, and reflect on the importance of contextualizing health risks relative to food-health systems more broadly. We discuss how misrepresenting risks, intentionally or unintentionally, to justify conservation practices can have unintended negative conservation and public health consequences-despite the importance of conservation in protecting human health more broadly. We stress the importance of considering individual and local health outcomes (food security, neglected tropical diseases, etc.), not only those impacting global health (i.e. pandemic prevention). Finally, we advocate for evidence-informed, context-appropriate strategies for wild meat management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.