ReviewObesity pillars2025
The impact of ultra-processed foods on pediatric health.
Review in Obesity pillars, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prospective association between baseline ultra-processed food consumption and future adherence to the 24-h movement guidelines in children: findings from the SENDO project.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- The association between adapted dietary index for gut microbiota and carotid intima-media thickness among overweight or obese children and adolescents.Acta diabetologica · 2026Article
- Modulation of Dietary 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural-Induced Intestinal Epithelial Stress by Blueberry Polyphenols.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Association of Ultra-Processed Food Intake with Insulin Secretion and Sensitivity in Mexican American Children: Results from the SAFARI Study.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Prevalence of overweight and obesity and their associations with lifestyle habits among late adolescents in the Northern Border Region of Saudi Arabia: a cross‑sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Association between unhealthy food consumption and mental health outcomes in children and adolescents: an umbrella review.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2026Review
- Migration-Related Characteristics and Children's Consumption of Ultra-Processed Foods.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ultra-processed food exposure and health outcomes: Current evidence, controversies, and future perspectives.EXCLI journal · 2026Review
- Childhood Obesity Prevalence and Prevention Strategies in Primary Care: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- The excess body fat is a potential mediator between consumption of ultra-processed foods and cardiometabolic risk in normal-weight Brazilian children.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) have become increasingly incorporated into pediatric diets, accounting for approximately 67 % of the total energy consumption in United States (US) children. Manufactured through industrial processing and enriched with excess sugars, unhealthy fats, and sodium, while lacking essential nutrients, UPFs present a substantial public health concern. We aimed to conduct a comprehensive review of the impact of UPFs on pediatric health. Methods: We reviewed the effects of UPF on pediatric health using data from observational studies, systematic reviews, and policy reports. Our review explored the social, environmental, and economic drivers of UPF consumption, associated health consequences, and proposed mitigation strategies. We also examined National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data, the 2025 US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee's (USDA) report, and the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) commission findings. Results: UPF intake has dramatically increased during early childhood, with toddlers and school-aged children obtaining 47 % and 59.4 % of their daily calories, respectively, from UPFs. Higher consumption is linked to pediatric obesity, cardiometabolic risks such as insulin resistance and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), mental health concerns, and gut microbiome disruption. Early-life exposure to UPFs can establish unhealthy dietary patterns that persist into adulthood, raising the risk of chronic disease. Greater UPF consumption is often observed among lower-income families, highlighting a key health disparity. Conclusion: UPF consumption is a modifiable risk factor for non-communicable diseases in children. Addressing it requires urgent, coordinated action at multiple levels. Strategies include UPF and sugar-sweetened beverage screening during well-child visits, policy restrictions on food marketing, clearer nutrition labeling, healthier school meals, and personalized family-centered dietary counseling. Clinicians need standardized tools and training to counsel families effectively. Policy initiatives should prioritize prevention-focused measures to protect children's health.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.