ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Construction and validation of a predictive model for post-operative kinesiophobia in total hip arthroplasty patients.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective treatment for end-stage hip disease, which can significantly relieve pain, rebuild joint function, and improve patients' quality of life. Early post-operative functional exercises are essential to promote the recovery of hip function and minimize complications. However, some patients are afraid of exercise due to the risk of pain or dislocation of the prosthesis, resulting in poor adherence to rehabilitation exercises. Kinesiophobia has now become a key factor hindering the rehabilitation process and leading to poor functional recovery. Therefore, early identification of high-risk groups and implementation of targeted interventions are essential to improve patient prognosis. Objectives: To construct and validate a risk prediction model for post-operative kinesiophobia in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients. Methods: This study is a single-center cross-sectional study with only internal validation. Through the convenience sampling method, 205 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University from October 2024 to May 2025 were selected as the study subjects. Independent predictors associated with the occurrence of kinesiophobia were screened by univariate analysis and multifactorial logistic regression analysis. A nomogram risk prediction model was constructed using R software, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision analysis curves (DCA) were used to evaluate the model's goodness-of-fit, discriminability, calibration, and clinical utility, respectively. The Bootstrap method was used to perform 1,000 repeated samplings for internal validation of the model. Results: A total of 126 out of 205 post-operative THA patients developed kinesiophobia, and the incidence of kinesiophobia was 61.5%. Logistic regression showed that pain history duration, anxiety, hip function, coping style, and rehabilitation self-efficacy were the influencing factors for the development of kinesiophobia in post-operative patients with THA ( Conclusion: THA patients with a pain history duration (> 1 year), anxiety, poor hip function, low active coping, and poor rehabilitation self-efficacy are more likely to develop kinesiophobia after surgery. The constructed model has good predictive efficacy, which is helpful for early clinical identification of high-risk patients and provides a reference for developing individualized interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.