ReviewJournal of inflammation research2025
Utility of Machine Learning to Characterize Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis and Its Clinical Implications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Review in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From dysbiosis to precision medicine: targeting the microbial-metabolic axis in IBD management.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) arises from complex interactions among host genetics, immune dysregulation, environmental factors, and the gut microbiome. Numerous studies have demonstrated alterations in microbial composition and function, including reduced diversity and changes in metabolic pathways. Traditional biostatistical approaches, such as differential abundance analysis, have advanced our understanding but are remain limited in handling nonlinear and high-dimensional data. Machine learning (ML) complements these methods by integrating heterogeneous datasets and uncovering hidden patterns that improve classification and predictive accuracy. In IBD, delayed diagnosis and the lack of reliable biomarkers highlight the need for computational tools that can translate complex microbiome data into clinically actionable insights. ML and deep learning (DL) have expanded analytical capabilities, enabling disease classification, subtype differentiation, and prediction of therapeutic responses. This review provides an integrative perspective on how ML and DL are reshaping microbiome-based IBD research, summarizing their strengths, limitations, and essential considerations for clinical translation. Future progress will depend on standardized microbiome assays, rigorous benchmarking, and the integration of multi-omics data to elucidate host-microbe interactions. With these advancements, ML- and DL-based approaches may offer precise diagnostics and personalized treatment strategies, transforming microbiome research into practical tools for IBD care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.