ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2025
Construction of a Nomogram Prediction Model for Individualized Prediction of the Risk of Non Suicidal Self Injury in Adolescent Depression Patients.
Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Cross-Sectional Study Utilizing Online Support Communities for Tic Disorders: the Association between Participation Duration and Quality of Life in Children with Tic Disorders and Their Caregivers.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Construction and internal temporal validation of a LASSO regression-based risk assessment model for non-suicidal self-injury addiction-like features in adolescents and young adults with depression.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a nomogram model for individualized prediction of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) risk in adolescent depression patients. Methods: Clinical data from 270 adolescent depression patients (August 2022-January 2025) were randomly divided into modeling and validation groups. The modeling group was split into NSSI and non-NSSI subgroups based on NSSI occurrence. Logistic regression identified risk factors. R software was used to construct the nomogram, while ROC and DCA evaluated its discrimination and clinical utility. Results: A total of 189 patients from our hospital were retrospectively selected, among whom 72 patients (38.10%) were identified as having engaged in NSSI behavior within the past year. Disease duration, depression level, childhood abuse, family dysfunction, school bullying, sleep disorder, and Barratt Impulsiveness were significant risk factors (P<0.05). AUCs were 0.899 (modeling) and 0.954 (validation). H-L tests showed good fit: χ²=7.243 (P=0.721) and χ²=7.010 (P=0.711). The DCA curve indicated high clinical value when probability ranged from 0.05 to 0.97. Conclusion: Disease course, severity of depression, childhood abuse, dysfunctional family environment during childhood, experiences of school bullying, sleep disorders, and Barratt Impulsiveness Scale scores were identified as influencing factors for NSSI in adolescents with depression. Based on these factors, a nomogram model was constructed, which showed good predictive consistency and high clinical applicability. This model can assist clinicians in identifying high-risk individuals for early prevention. Although the model may help guide interventions to reduce the incidence of NSSI, further validation through rigorously designed implementation studies is still required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.