ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025
Association Between Oxidative Balance Score and Gynecological Cancer Using NHANES 2011-2018 Data.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Oxidative stress has been implicated in the pathogenesis of various malignancies, including gynecological cancers (GC). This study aimed to evaluate the association between oxidative balance score (OBS) and GC prevalence using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2018. Methods: A total of 7816 adult female participants were included, of whom 195 reported a history of GC (cervical, endometrial, or ovarian). OBS was computed from 20 components: 15 antioxidants and five pro-oxidants from dietary and lifestyle sources. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for GC according to the OBS tertiles and per-unit increases, adjusting for covariates. Results: Higher total OBS was associated with significantly lower odds of GC (adjusted OR per unit increase = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.86-0.97). Participants in the highest OBS tertile had 34% lower odds of developing GC than those in the lowest tertile. This association was more pronounced among women aged ≥60 years, non-smokers, and those with normal body mass index (BMI). Conclusion: Greater antioxidant exposure, as reflected by higher OBS, was inversely associated with GC risk. These findings support dietary and lifestyle interventions aimed at improving oxidative balance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.