ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
How do policymakers involve citizens in advancing health? A mixed-method qualitative study in municipalities in the Netherlands.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Citizen involvement in health policymaking is becoming imperative. Yet, implementing this practice in local policymaking often proves challenging. This study explores how local policymakers in the Netherlands experience and approach citizen involvement in health promotion policymaking. Methods: In 2023, a stratified random sample of 65 out of 342 Dutch municipalities was selected to participate in this mixed-method study, combining survey responses and interviews. Policymakers from 22 Dutch municipalities participated. Descriptive quantitative analysis and content analysis was applied. Results: Policymakers widely value citizen involvement in health policymaking for understanding community perspectives and needs, identifying priorities and agenda setting, identifying solutions and building public trust, accountability and transparency. In day-to-day practice, citizens are mainly approached for prioritising policy issues or for brainstorming on solutions. A range of consultation methods is used, sometimes in collaboration with public health services or research institutions. Time commitment and ensuring data quality are the main challenges for meaningful citizen involvement next to organizational challenges. Concerns about the quality of the data relates to low response rate and selective response. At times, policymakers may not have the appropriate resources or expertise to facilitate effective citizen involvement. In the domain of preventive health, the following questions on citizen involvement arose: How to address needs, how to include population groups with greater health risks, how to understand citizens' context well? Conclusion: Citizen involvement is a recognised and frequently applied practice in local health policymaking. However, efforts remain fragmented and face operational barriers. These challenges are particularly pronounced in the area of health promotion policymaking. Stronger support and local capacity can improve the inclusiveness and impact of citizen engagement, particularly in preventive health policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.