ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings2026
Ethically Integrating Genomics in Primary Care: An Invitation to Share Implementation Best Practices.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating genomic medicine into primary care -examining perceptions of community advisory board members.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Primary care stakeholder perspectives on clinical implementation of patient-reported hereditary cancer risk-assessment.BMC primary care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic innovations, including pharmacogenomics, are becoming increasingly relevant to routine medical care and hold promise for advancing prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment in primary care. However, integrating genetic services in this setting requires navigating a fragmented health care system, guided by national recommendations but marked by variability in reimbursement, clinician training, and infrastructure across regions. This article presents insights from a multidisciplinary Mayo Clinic task force examining the clinical, ethical, and implementation aspects of genomic services for adult primary care patients. We highlight the role of primary care clinicians in identifying individuals at risk for inherited conditions, such as hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, Lynch syndrome, and familial hypercholesterolemia. The article outlines current implementation models, emphasizes the value of family history, and addresses persistent challenges including limited clinician confidence, time constraints, and inconsistent access to services due to insurance and reimbursement variability. Educational and systems-level approaches, including core competencies, clinical decision support, and ethical frameworks, are essential to support primary care clinicians and to ensure responsible, scalable implementation. We also explore how genomics can reinforce the primary care mission by enabling patient-centered care, improving outcomes, and proactively addressing gaps in access. Ethical considerations, such as patient autonomy, informed consent, and privacy-sensitive communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.