ReviewActa diabetologica2026
Advances in diabetic wound healing: from pathophysiology to emerging therapies.
Review in Acta diabetologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Natural Bioactive-Based Advanced Wound Dressings for Diabetic Wound Healing: A Systematic Review of Emerging Biomaterial Platforms.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Pooled it
- Ononin-modified Chitosan/β-glycerophosphate hydrogel-loaded adipose-derived stem cells promote the repair of diabetic wounds in rats.BMC biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic wounds (DWs), particularly those affecting the lower extremities, represent a significant clinical challenge due to their chronic nature and high risk of complications, including infection and amputation. Despite advances in diabetes management, conventional wound care strategies often fail to achieve satisfactory healing outcomes, largely due to the complex pathophysiology of DWs, are involving impaired angiogenesis, chronic inflammation, and compromised immune responses. The data on the conventional and emerging therapies used in the management of DWs were searched using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to locate literature published. Studies have shown that conventional wound care interventions like debridement, dressing, and infection control mostly provide symptomatic treatment without eliminating underlying cellular and molecular diabetic wound pathophysiology. Recent years have witnessed the emergence of novel therapeutic approaches, including stem cell therapy, gene therapy, nanotechnology-based interventions, and tissue engineering. These strategies improve angiogenesis, alter the polarization of macrophages, and stimulate tissue repair, which can offer new hope for enhancing wound healing in diabetic patients. This review synthesizes current literature on the pathophysiology of diabetic wound healing, evaluates the limitations of traditional therapies, and provides a comprehensive overview of cutting-edge treatments that holds an effective diabetic wound management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41369772What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.