ArticleNutrition reviews2026
Elucidating the Probiotic Potential of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium Species in Modulating Glucose Metabolism and Inflammation in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Scoping Review.
Article in Nutrition reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects 14% of pregnancies globally, contributing to gut microbial dysbiosis, inflammation, and insulin resistance. Probiotic supplementation with Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species has potential in addressing GDM by modulating gut microbiota. However, findings from clinical trials are inconsistent. In this scoping review, the evidence on the role of Lactobacillus- and Bifidobacterium-based probiotic supplementation in managing GDM is mapped systematically, and knowledge gaps and future research directions are identified. Following Arksey and O'Malley's framework, an initial database search was conducted in February 2023 across 4 literature databases for articles on randomized controlled trials published since 2013; a second search in January 2025 included studies published after February 2023, reflecting ongoing research in this field. Title and abstract screening were conducted using Rayyan, followed by full-text review, yielding 29 eligible studies. Cohen's d was used to quantify the magnitude of the effect. The interventions included encapsulated probiotics or fermented foods containing various Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species. The findings consistently showed improvements in fasting glucose levels, insulin sensitivity, and reduction in serum insulin levels and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance with increased Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index scores. Improvements in glucose metabolism were linked to short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), activating G-protein coupled receptors (GPRs), boosting GLP1 secretion, and insulin release. Probiotic interventions also favorably modulated inflammatory markers (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 [IL-6], and tumor necrosis factor-α), likely through enhanced mucus production, SCFAs binding to GPR109, strengthening tight junctions, and concurrent release of IL-18 and IL-10. The evidence indicates the potential of Lactobacillus- and Bifidobacterium-based probiotic interventions to beneficially influence glucose metabolism, inflammatory response, and gut microbial balance in GDM. Heterogeneity in probiotic formulations across studies, probiotic doses, and regional differences in diet and lifestyle underscore the need for more targeted and standardized research to fully understand the therapeutic potential of probiotics in GDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.