ArticlePLOS global public health2025
How to make sense of information about COVID-19 and the vaccine from the authorities? A qualitative study of migrants' experiences in two Swedish communities.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "It's about creating a sense of we": exploring the role of civil society in intercultural communication during COVID-19 in Stockholm, Sweden.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the communication challenges faced by public authorities in reaching all groups in society. The overall aim of this study is to gain an in-depth understanding of the experiences of non-native Swedish speaking residents in two multicultural municipalities in metropolitan Stockholm regarding the reception and understanding of COVID-19 and vaccination information from authorities. In addition, the aim is to identify sustainable communication approaches for culturally appropriate linguistic translation of health messages. Between May 2022 and December 2023, interviews were conducted with residents (n = 76) in two areas of Stockholm, Sweden. We used qualitative thematic analysis to develop themes. We developed five themes: Understanding and learning about COVID-19 and the vaccine; Conflicting knowledge bases; Whom to trust; Views on official communication and actions; and Preparing the local community for a future health crisis. For the non-native Swedish speaking residents in this study, understanding the authorities' information about COVID-19 and vaccination was complicated, and receiving information in their own mother tongue was important to facilitate understanding. Deciding what sources and information to trust was a multifaceted and difficult task. For authorities to communicate trustworthy information in a public health crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the findings point to the importance of language, community engagement, authorities working with local health facilities, community actors, trusted leaders and religious organisations, and the value of verbal and culturally adapted information. We suggest that Antonovsky's concept of Sense of Coherence should be considered for successful health crisis communication aimed at behaviour change and the importance of local community preparedness for future health crises. The results suggest that culturally and linguistically sensitive messages that consider people's social realities, not least those most vulnerable in society, can support their sense of purpose in changing their behaviour in a crisis, but also inform policy guidance in health care. Trial registration The study protocol has been preregistered on the Open Science Framework (osf.io/rt47j).
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.