ArticlePloS one2025
Creating a Research-Ready Data Asset version of primary care data for Wales and investigating the impact of COVID-19 on utilisation of primary care services.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe developed an efficient Research-Ready Data Asset (RRDA) for the Welsh Longitudinal General Practice (WLGP) data within the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage Databank to standardise curation, enhance reproducibility, and facilitate research on primary care trends. Using this, we investigated primary care activity trends during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsThe RRDA involves cleaning, curation using GP-registration history, and transforming data into a structured, normalised format to support efficient large-scale queries. A comprehensive clinical code look-up was developed, incorporating official, local, and supplementary categories to enhance event classification. To enable patient-practice interaction analysis, a four-layer approach was developed to capture healthcare providers, access mode, interaction type, and event details. We assessed RRDA coverage, defined as the proportion of residents with shared primary care records, stratified by demographic and geographic factors, using longitudinal binomial Generalised Additive Mixed Models (GAMMs). We categorised GP events into key activity types and summarised averaged daily rates per month per 100,000 people (2000-2024), with trends analysed using negative binomial GAMMs.
resultsCurating 4.6 billion records for 5.1 million people (1990-2024) revealed significant improvements in data quality and completeness over time, with data retention increased from 40% to 94%, and patient inclusion from 43% to 98%. Use of SNOMED-CT and local codes increased after Read-V2 discontinuation in 2018, while invalid codes declined-reflecting evolving coding practices and improved data quality. WLGP RRDA coverage rose from 35% in 1990 to 86% in 2024, with regional variation but modest demographic differences. From 2000 to 2024, consultation rates rose by 1.9 times, with post-COVID-19 pandemic levels 8% above 2019. Prescription-only activity doubled with little variation associated with the pandemic. Vaccination rates spiked during the pandemic, and remain 1.8 times above pre-pandemic levels. Other less frequent activities were significantly disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic but recovered to 2019 levels.
conclusionsThe WLGP RRDA improves the usability of primary care data, supporting timely, scalable analysis of healthcare delivery and system-level trends.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.