Evidence mapPaperPMID 41370304Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Modulatory feedback determines attentional object segmentation in a model of the ventral stream.

Paolo Papale, Jonathan R Williford, Stijn Balk, Pieter R Roelfsema

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paolo PapaleDepartment of Vision & Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (KNAW), Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6249-841X
Jonathan R WillifordDepartment of Vision & Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (KNAW), Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Stijn BalkDepartment of Vision & Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (KNAW), Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Pieter R RoelfsemaDepartment of Vision & Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (KNAW), Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies in neuroscience inspired progress in the design of artificial neural networks (ANNs), and, vice versa, ANNs provide new insights into the functioning of brain circuits. So far, the focus has been on how ANNs can help to explain the tuning of neurons at various stages of the visual cortical hierarchy. However, the role of modulatory feedback connections, which play a role in attention and perceptual organization, has not yet been resolved. The present study presents a biologically plausible neural network that performs scene segmentation and can shift attention using modulatory feedback connections from higher to lower cortical brain areas. The model replicates several neurophysiological signatures of recurrent processing. Specifically, figural regions elicit more activity in model units than background regions. The modulation of activity by figure and ground occurs at a delay after the first feedforward response, because it depends on a loop through the higher model areas. Importantly, the figural response enhancement is amplified by object-based attention, which stays focused on the figural regions and does not spill over to the adjacent background, just as is observed in the visual cortex. Our results indicate how progress in artificial intelligence can be used to garner insight into the recurrent cortical processing for scene segmentation and object-based attention.

Indexed as

AttentionModels, NeurologicalVisual CortexHumansNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID41370304
PMCPMC12694832

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.