Evidence mapPaperPMID 41370427Full record

ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2025

Gastric sleeve and gastric bypass: changes in weight after two-year follow-up - which is more effective?

Alexandra Rabello Freire, Flávio Kreimer, Denise Sandrelly Cavalcanti de Lima, Cinthia Katiane Martins Calado, Silvia Alves da Silva, Maria Goretti Pessoa de Araújo Burgos

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexandra Rabello FreireUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Clinical Nutrition Unit, University Hospital - Recife (PE), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8868-5101
Flávio KreimerUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Department of Surgery - Recife (PE), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6164-9987
Denise Sandrelly Cavalcanti de LimaUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Clinical Nutrition Unit, University Hospital - Recife (PE), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1857-0469
Cinthia Katiane Martins CaladoUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Clinical Nutrition Unit, University Hospital - Recife (PE), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1057-6199
Silvia Alves da SilvaUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Vitoria Academic Center - Vitória de Santo Antão (PE), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7194-9737
Maria Goretti Pessoa de Araújo BurgosUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Nutrition Department - Recife (PE), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4980-5822

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBariatric surgery is currently the gold standard for the treatment of obesity. However, weight recurrence varies among the different surgical methods.

aimsTo compare changes in weight one and two years after bariatric surgery considering the gastric bypass and gastric sleeve methods.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at a hospital with adults of both sexes followed up for two years after surgery. Anthropometric, sociodemographic, clinical, and lifestyle characteristics were analyzed.

resultsA total of 184 patients, predominantly women (82.1%), were assessed (136 submitted to gastric sleeve and 48 to gastric bypass). Good adherence to the multivitamin, but not to diet or physical activity, was verified in both groups. The percentages of weight loss and excess weight loss were higher in the gastric bypass group (one year after surgery: p<0.001 and p=0.010, respectively; two years after surgery: p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Average weight gain was 2.37 kg and higher after gastric sleeve (p=0.042), whereas no difference between methods was found for the percentage of weight recurrence. Weight loss and recurrence at the two-year follow-up were influenced by diet in both groups. The percentage of weight loss was higher after gastric bypass one and two years after surgery. Weight recurrence was higher after the gastric sleeve method, without interfering with the surgical success of the technique.

conclusionsWe verified greater efficacy in the gastric bypass technique in terms of weight loss at 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Weight recurrence was found 24 months after both methods, especially in the gastric sleeve group, without constituting surgical failure.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassObesity, MorbidWeight LossAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID41370427
PMCPMC12695080

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.