ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2025
Instrument for assessing (self)care competence in people with gastrostomy and their caregivers: a methodological study.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto describe the development process of an instrument to monitor the development of (self-)care competencies in individuals with gastrostomies and their caregivers.
methodsmethodological research study. Content validity was obtained through a focus group of experts. The instrument was pre-tested on a sample of 18 participants, using a non-probabilistic and intentional sampling technique. Inter-rater agreement was also assessed at a hospital in northern Portugal.
resultsthe study resulted in an instrument with 34 measurement indicators, grouped into six domains, with recognized content validity. In the instrument pre-test, good inter-rater agreement values of 80-100% were obtained.
conclusionsthe instrument proved to be comprehensive and easy to apply in assessing (self)care competency in feeding ostomies, offering potential for future validity investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.