ReviewArchives of endocrinology and metabolism2025
Supplements for bone health.
Review in Archives of endocrinology and metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Voices of endocrinology: contemporary insights in endocrine and metabolic disorders.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuederratum.2026
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bonehealth is influenced by a dynamic interplay of genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors, with nutrition playing a vital role throughout life. This review consolidates the current evidence on the roles of essential micronutrients, specifically calcium, vitamin D, vitamin K, magnesium, and phosphorus, in skeletal metabolism and integrity. Calcium and vitamin D, the most extensively studied, have been shown to reduce bone loss and fracture risk, particularly in institutionalized individuals or those with deficiencies, while evidence is less consistent in the general population. Although vitamin K, magnesium, and phosphorus are important for bone physiology, the clinical evidence supporting their supplementation is either limited or context dependent. Additionally, this review explores the current status of micronutrient intake in Brazil and discusses potential risks associated with excessive or inappropriate supplementation, such as cardiovascular issues and mineral metabolism disturbances. An individualized, evidence-informed approach may be beneficial in optimizing bone health while minimizing adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.