Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41370784›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Development and Validation of a Web-Based Machine Learning Model for Predicting Early Neurological Deterioration Following Stroke Thrombolysis: Multicenter Study.

Juan Li, Huanxian Chang, Shouyun Du, Chunyang Zhang, Han Zhang, Luming Li, Lingsheng Kong, Guodong Li, Tingting Liang, Ronghong Yang and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Juan Li *The Neurology Department, Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, No. 182 Tongguan North Road, Jiangsu, Lianyungang, 222001, China, 86 18961326515.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0307-2619
Huanxian Chang *The Neurology Department, Lianyungang Oriental Hospital, Lianyungang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2842-6803
Shouyun Du *The Neurology Department, Guanyun Country People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6239-9303
Chunyang ZhangThe Neurology Department, Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, No. 182 Tongguan North Road, Jiangsu, Lianyungang, 222001, China, 86 18961326515.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3323-0067
Han ZhangThe Neurology Department, Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, No. 182 Tongguan North Road, Jiangsu, Lianyungang, 222001, China, 86 18961326515.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0740-9880
Luming LiThe Neurology Department, Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, No. 182 Tongguan North Road, Jiangsu, Lianyungang, 222001, China, 86 18961326515.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-7301-6649
Lingsheng KongThe Neurology Department, Lianyungang Oriental Hospital, Lianyungang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2388-9948
Guodong LiThe Neurology Department, Guanyun Country People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9669-6642
Tingting LiangThe Neurology Department, Lianyungang Oriental Hospital, Lianyungang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2841-516X
Ronghong YangThe Neurology Department, Guanyun Country People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6036-0560
Bingchao XuThe Neurology Department, Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, No. 182 Tongguan North Road, Jiangsu, Lianyungang, 222001, China, 86 18961326515.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1259-4765
Xinyu ZhouThe Neurology Department, Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, No. 182 Tongguan North Road, Jiangsu, Lianyungang, 222001, China, 86 18961326515.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9647-1100
Guanghui ZhangThe Neurology Department, Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, No. 182 Tongguan North Road, Jiangsu, Lianyungang, 222001, China, 86 18961326515.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6289-4965
Yongan SunThe Neurology Department, Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, No. 182 Tongguan North Road, Jiangsu, Lianyungang, 222001, China, 86 18961326515.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3042-1815
Xiaobing HeThe Neurology Department, Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, No. 182 Tongguan North Road, Jiangsu, Lianyungang, 222001, China, 86 18961326515.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6653-3245
Bei XuThe Neurology Department, Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, No. 182 Tongguan North Road, Jiangsu, Lianyungang, 222001, China, 86 18961326515.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7174-3205
Zaipo LiThe Neurology Department, Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, No. 182 Tongguan North Road, Jiangsu, Lianyungang, 222001, China, 86 18961326515.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4698-3119
Yanan HeDepartment of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6476-1833
Mingli HeThe Neurology Department, Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, No. 182 Tongguan North Road, Jiangsu, Lianyungang, 222001, China, 86 18961326515.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1772-8183

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early neurological deterioration (END) significantly worsens outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) receiving intravenous thrombolysis, yet clinicians lack reliable tools to identify high-risk patients who need intensified monitoring and preemptive interventions. Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a high-performance machine learning model for END prediction that enables personalized risk-stratified management of patients with AIS after thrombolysis. Methods: This multicenter study analyzed 1927 patients with AIS who were treated with intravenous thrombolysis in 3 hospitals, comprising a development cohort (n=1361) from Lianyungang Clinical Medical College and an external validation cohort (n=566) from 2 independent hospitals. We systematically evaluated 27 clinical parameters using multiple machine learning algorithms to develop ENDRAS (Early Neurological Deterioration Risk Assessment Score), a prediction model based on 6 readily available clinical variables. Model performance was assessed through comprehensive metrics (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score) in both internal and external validation cohorts. Results: The XGBoost-based ENDRAS showed promising predictive performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve=0.988, 95% CI 0.983-0.993) using 6 readily available parameters: Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment classification, intracranial artery stenosis severity, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, systolic blood pressure, neutrophil count, and red blood cell distribution width. We established a dual-pathway management protocol for stratifying patients into low-risk (<29%) and high-risk (≥29%) groups, where high-risk patients receive intensive monitoring with hourly assessments and expedited imaging, while low-risk patients follow a resource-optimized protocol without compromising safety. Implemented as a web-based calculator with a <0.02-second computation time, ENDRAS enables real-time clinical decision support at the point of care. Conclusions: ENDRAS integrates END prediction into actionable clinical pathways, potentially improving postthrombolysis care through personalized monitoring strategies and targeted interventions. Its robust performance in merged cohorts, efficient computation time, and structured management framework address key challenges in stroke care while enhancing resource utilization. Further prospective validation across diverse populations is needed to fully establish ENDRAS as a standard clinical decision-support system, but its ability to identify high-risk patients early may significantly improve outcomes in AIS.

Indexed as

InternetIschemic StrokeMachine LearningStrokeThrombolytic TherapyAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedacute ischemic strokeclinical decision supportearly neurological deteriorationintravenous thrombolysismachine learningprediction modelstroke

Identifiers

PMID41370784
PMCPMC12694949

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.