Trial reportJMIR formative research2025
Everyday Digital Support to Promote Health and Literacy Among Older Adults: 14-Week Randomized Digital Pilot Trial by Engagement Level.
Trial report in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While digital health solutions are becoming increasingly sophisticated, simple forms of everyday digital support may offer underexplored opportunities to promote health among older adults. However, evidence remains scarce on whether such teleassistance-based approaches can effectively enhance health literacy and daily self-care, particularly among populations facing socioeconomic and educational disparities. Objective: This study examined whether a 14-week mobile teleassistance intervention could support daily health promotion and improve health literacy and quality of life among older adults, and whether different levels of user engagement were associated with differences in outcomes. Methods: This randomized digital pilot study involved 21 older adults (aged ≥60 years) from Ribeirão Preto, Brazil. All participants were assigned to the intervention arm and subsequently categorized into high-engagement (n=11) and low-engagement (n=10) subgroups according to platform-use metrics. The intervention combined weekly teleconsultations, gamified educational quizzes, and guided health-related activities delivered through a mobile app. Outcomes included health literacy (Health Literacy Questionnaire), quality of life (36-Item Short-Form Health Survey), physical activity, and sedentary behavior, assessed at baseline and postintervention. Analyses appropriate for small samples were applied, including frequentist and Bayesian models. Results: Participants in the high-engagement subgroup showed greater improvements in health literacy compared with those in the low-engagement subgroup (mean change +9.5 vs +9.1 points; time × group: P<.001; Bayes Factors [BF₁₀]=15). Significant interactions also favored higher engagement for selected quality-of-life domains: vitality (P≤.001), functional capacity (P=.02), and general health (P=.02). A group effect was observed for the mental component (P<.001). Physical activity (F2,38=0.95; P=.39; BF_incl=0.68) and sedentary behavior (F1,19=1.12; P=.32; BF_incl=0.53) did not differ significantly between subgroups. Engagement analytics confirmed higher overall platform use in the high-engagement subgroup (mean 6483.8, SD 807.0 vs mean 3345.3, SD 742.7; t19=6.238; P<.001; d=2.73) and more weekly health-activity minutes (mean 5124.3, SD 757.9 vs mean 3120.7, SD 704.3; t19=6.256; P<.001; d=2.73). Conclusions: This 14-week randomized digital pilot trial suggests that everyday digital teleassistance may enhance health literacy and specific quality-of-life domains among older adults when engagement is high. However, such support alone appears insufficient to modify physical activity or sedentary behavior in the short term. Larger and longer trials are needed to assess sustainability, scalability, and strategies to address structural inequalities in digital health adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.