ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Development of a Hospital-at-Home Digital Twin for Patients With Frailty: Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Increasing demand on health care systems requires innovative, transformative solutions for efficient, high-quality care. One promising approach is digital twin (DT) technology, which leverages real-time data to create dynamic, virtual representations of a physical entity (individuals or space) to anticipate future scenarios and support care decisions. Although DTs have been explored in various sectors, their application in hospital at home (HaH), which delivers acute-level care in home environments, remains unexplored. Objective: This review bridges a critical knowledge gap, examining existing evidence on DT-enabling tools to manage patients with frailty in home settings. This will identify the underpinning architectural components required to inform an HaH-DT system supporting clinical decision-making. Methods: We searched 6 electronic databases and gray literature for primary English-language studies published between January 2019 and September 2025. Included studies reported on the monitoring or management of patients with frailty within their own home. Information was charted on a predefined data collection form to answer the research objectives. Review articles, protocols, and conference abstracts were excluded. Results: We included 69 reports: 54% (37/69) used quantitative approaches, and 36% (25/69) were pilot or feasibility studies. Reports were analyzed for DT-enabling tools and systematically mapped across the proposed 5-layered DT architecture: sensing, communication, storage, analytics, and visualization. DT layer taxonomies, interconnections, and classifications of data types collected (eg, about the patient, home environment, use of medical equipment) are presented. This evidence identifies DT-enabling tools for a variety of functions and a range of sensing technologies (eg, wearable-based passive sensing, active physiological sensors, ambient sensors detecting motion or environmental changes). The most prevalent communication modes were wireless and network-based (36/112, 32.1%), the majority (12/36, 33%) using Bluetooth. Better understanding of data management, particularly secure storage, is required within local health care systems. The emerging potential of predictive and prescriptive analytics for risk prediction, clinical decision-making, or activation of alert-triggered health interventions by clinicians was mapped. Analytics methods are currently largely descriptive. Advanced methods such as prescriptive analytics for recommendations of an optimal course of action and diagnostic analytics that highlight why a situation has occurred are lacking. DT-enabling tools demonstrate patient-centered benefits, including enhanced motivation, reassurance, and personalized care. Concerns include device accuracy, user acceptability, and implications for carers and organizational workflows. Conclusions: This review is among the first to systematically map DT-enabling tools to inform a potential HaH DT for patients with frailty, organized by a 5-layered conceptual model. Understanding these architectural layers provides the foundations for stakeholders to advance research and development in areas where there are knowledge gaps and consider how an HaH DT can effectively operate within current health care systems. Leveraging technology-enabled care in complex home-based settings provides great potential to deliver safer, personalized, timely care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.