Evidence mapPaperPMID 41371739Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2025

Comparison of Vyntus CPX and Vmax Encore 29N for indirect calorimetry: a randomised crossover study in participants of the German Diabetes Study with type 2 diabetes.

Nina Trinks, Jennifer Pützer, Agnieszka Sutkowski, Volker Burkart, Michael Roden, Oliver Kuss

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01055093 (Prospective Study on Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications in Newly Diagnosed Adult Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01055093 recruitingnot on this map

Prospective Study on Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications in Newly Diagnosed Adult Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorGerman Diabetes CenterRan2005 to 2040Enrolled2,000ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nina TrinksInstitute for Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Institute for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Jennifer PützerInstitute for Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Institute for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2049-6149
Agnieszka SutkowskiInstitute for Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Institute for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9474-2054
Volker BurkartInstitute for Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Institute for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Michael RodenInstitute for Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Institute for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany Michael.Roden@ddz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8200-6382
Oliver KussGerman Center for Diabetes Research, Partner Düsseldorf, München-Neuherberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study compared the reliability of two metabolic cart systems, Vyntus CPX and Vmax Encore 29N, to measure whole-body energy metabolism by indirect calorimetry (IC) in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

designRandomised, prospective, crossover study.

settingSingle-centre study conducted in the clinical research centre of the German Diabetes Study (GDS).

participantsFive participants (3 men, 2 women, mean age 49±6 years, body mass index (BMI) 32.62±4.2 kg/m²) with T2D completed the study protocol. Eligibility requires existing participation in GDS and availability for four consecutive study days.

interventionsParticipants underwent four IC measurements per day on four consecutive days, totalling 16 measurements per device. On each study day, two measurements with both devices, Vyntus CPX and Vmax Encore 29N, were performed in randomised order. Postcalorimetric gas calibration with normalisation was applied after each measurement. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Reliability of respiratory quotient (RQ) and resting energy expenditure (REE), as assessed from the coefficient of variation (CV) and 95% CIs.

resultsDevice comparison showed minor differences in CV (95% CI) for carbon dioxide production (VCO TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01055093.

Indexed as

Calorimetry, IndirectDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Energy MetabolismAdultCross-Over StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsClinical TrialDIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGYDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2MethodsNUTRITION & DIETETICSResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID41371739
PMCPMC12699547

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.