ArticleScientific reports2025
Segmental body BIA device development for fracture detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bone fractures are a major health issue worldwide, often requiring diagnostic tools like X-rays or CT scans, which, despite their effectiveness, present drawbacks such as radiation exposure, high cost, and limited accessibility. To address these limitations, this study introduces a novel, low-cost, portable, and non-invasive segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) device based on the AD5933 impedance converter. The device was designed using a four-electrode configuration and integrates an ARM7 LPC2138 microcontroller, signal conditioning circuits, and a user-friendly LCD display for real-time data visualization. It operates at a fixed frequency of 50 kHz to measure impedance and phase angle variations in the human knee during fracture and healing stages. Validation was conducted using standard resistive and capacitive components, yielding measurement errors typically under 7%, thereby confirming its technical reliability. Clinical validation involved data collection of 125 patients with fractures, out of which 20 knee fracture patients are follow up, where clear differences in impedance and phase angle were observed before and after healing. These findings highlight the system's potential for real-time monitoring of bone healing, offering a reliable and accessible alternative to conventional imaging technologies, especially beneficial in rural and point of care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.