ArticleMolecular systems biology2026
Single cell transcriptional perturbome in pluripotent stem cell models.
Article in Molecular systems biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac microphysiological systems in cardiovascular research: Construction paradigms, maturation trajectories, and translational frontiers.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Review
- Combinatorial and Inducible CRISPRa/i Enables Canalized hiPSC Forward Programming and Iterative RefinementbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Refined and benchmarked homemade media for cost-effective, weekend-free human pluripotent stem cell culture.Open research Europe · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional genomics screens in human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) remain challenging despite their transformative potential. We developed iPS2-seq: an inducible, clone-aware screening platform that enables phenotype-agnostic, single-cell resolved dissection of loss-of-function effects in hiPSC derivatives, including complex multicellular models such as organoids. iPS2-seq distinguishes true perturbation effects from genetic and epigenetic variability. It supports pooled and arrayed formats, integrates with microfluidic or split-pool single-cell RNA sequencing, and extends to multi-omic profiling of chromatin and proteins. A dedicated pipeline, catcheR, streamlines design and analysis. The platform enables stage-specific follow-up dissection of screen hits. We demonstrate this by targeting congenital heart disease-associated genes in monolayer cardiomyocytes and organoids. This reveals that epigenetic neuroectodermal priming interferes with germ layer differentiation in specific clones. Accounting for this bias, we show that SMAD2 controls cardiac progenitor specification, with knockdown redirecting cells toward fibroblast and epicardial fates. iPS2-seq unlocks rigorous functional genomics in hiPSC-based models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.