SynthesisBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Sepsis mortality prediction using machine learning and deep learning - a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis, a critical infection-induced inflammatory condition, poses substantial global health challenges, demanding timely detection for effective intervention. This article explores the application of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) in predicting sepsis using electronic health record (EHR) to enhance patient outcomes. A comprehensive search across PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Google Scholar, and Scopus yielded 39 studies meeting stringent inclusion criteria. Predominantly retrospective (n = 34) and geographically diverse, these studies, spanning North America (n=19), Asia (n=13), Europe (n=6), and Australia (n=1), exhibited varied datasets, sepsis definitions, and prevalence rates, necessitating data augmentation strategies. Heterogeneous parameter usage, diverse model distribution, and inconsistent quality assessments were identified. Despite differences, longitudinal data showcased the potential of early sepsis prediction. The review outlines the challenges posed by disparate funding and article quality correlation, emphasizing the need for standardized evaluation metrics. In conclusion, this systematic review highlights the promising role of ML/DL methodologies in sepsis detection and early prediction through EHR, underscoring the imperative for standardized approaches and comprehensive quality assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.