Evidence mapPaperPMID 41373013Full record

ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2025

Efficacy and safety of metformin versus empagliflozin on chronic kidney disease progression (MET-EMPA-CKD): a randomized controlled trial.

Bassant M Mahboub, Ayman F Refaie, Sahar M El-Haggar, Yasser M Hafez, Tarek M Mostafa

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05373680 (Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Metformin Versus Empagliflozin for Halting Chronic Kidney Disease Progression), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05373680 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Metformin Versus Empagliflozin for Halting Chronic Kidney Disease Progression

TypeinterventionalSponsorTanta UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled118ConditionsRenal Insufficiency, ChronicArmsMetformin, Empagliflozin, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bassant M MahboubDrug and Poison Information Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Tanta, 31527, Egypt. bassantm.mahboub@pharm.tanta.edu.eg.
Ayman F RefaieNephrology and Transplant Unit, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.
Sahar M El-HaggarClinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Tanta, 31527, Egypt.
Yasser M HafezInternal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, 31527, Egypt.
Tarek M MostafaClinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Tanta, 31527, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic kidney disease (CKD) is a devastating progressive condition accompanied with high morbidity and mortality rates. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have recently proven their renoprotective effects, whereas evidence for metformin remains limited but suggestive of potential benefit. This study aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of metformin versus empagliflozin, a SGLT2 inhibitor, on retarding CKD progression with exploring supposed mechanistic pathways in clinical settings.

methodsIn this 12-month randomized controlled trial, 120 moderate CKD patients were randomized into three groups: metformin 1000 mg/day (n = 40) or empagliflozin 10 mg/day (n = 40), both added orally to standard treatment, or control who continued standard of care (n = 40). The primary outcome was changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Secondary analyses assessed percent changes of urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR), transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), kidney injury molecule (KIM)-1, and beclin-1 (an autophagy biomarker). Other metabolic and safety issues were also assessed.

results118 patients completed the study with comparable baseline data. Metformin and empagliflozin halted the decline in eGFR at study end with adjusted mean difference ± SE: 8.91 ± 1.92 (p˂0.001) and 5.1 ± 1.89 (p = 0.03), respectively, compared to control group. Metformin preserved its effect in diabetics and non-diabetics, with superiority than empagliflozin in non-diabetics. uACR was lowered by metformin and empagliflozin than control. Both of them tended to halt the deterioration of intermediates with %relative change of -28.8% (95% CI, -44.4 to -9, p = 0.003) and 179.3% (95% CI, 32.2 to 490, p = 0.003), for metformin versus control in TGF-β1 and beclin-1 levels, respectively. Empagliflozin reduced KIM-1 compared to control [-29% (95% CI, -49.3 to -0.5, p = 0.045)]. Study treatments showed benefits on lipid profile without changing urate levels significantly compared to the control arm. No significant changes were found between metformin and empagliflozin. Adverse effects were comparable across groups with tolerable increased urination frequency by empagliflozin.

conclusion12-month metformin therapy demonstrated renoprotective effects comparable to empagliflozin, with a greater effect observed among non-diabetics as an exploratory insight. Metformin's renal actions were linked to antifibrotic and favorable autophagy effects while, empagliflozin preserved mainly tubular injury. Safety issues were generally comparable. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT05373680, registered on 13/5/2022 "retrospectively".

Indexed as

AutophagyCKD progressionEmpagliflozinKIM-1MetforminRenoprotectionTGF-β

Identifiers

PMID41373013
PMCPMC12801430

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.