Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41373020›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in rheumatology (London, England)2025

Exercises plus intra-articular injection for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Christine Brumini, Jamil Natour, Sandra Mara Meireles Adolph, Rita Nely Vilar Furtado, Anamaria Jones

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in rheumatology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christine BruminiUniversidade Federal de Sao Paulo/Escola Paulista de Medicina (UNIFESP/EPM) - Disciplina de Reumatologia, Rua dos Otonis, 863 - Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, CEP 04025-002, Brazil.
Jamil NatourUniversidade Federal de Sao Paulo/Escola Paulista de Medicina (UNIFESP/EPM) - Disciplina de Reumatologia, Rua dos Otonis, 863 - Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, CEP 04025-002, Brazil. jnatour@unifesp.br.
Sandra Mara Meireles AdolphUniversidade Federal de Sao Paulo/Escola Paulista de Medicina (UNIFESP/EPM) - Disciplina de Reumatologia, Rua dos Otonis, 863 - Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, CEP 04025-002, Brazil.
Rita Nely Vilar FurtadoUniversidade Federal de Sao Paulo/Escola Paulista de Medicina (UNIFESP/EPM) - Disciplina de Reumatologia, Rua dos Otonis, 863 - Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, CEP 04025-002, Brazil.
Anamaria JonesUniversidade Federal de Sao Paulo/Escola Paulista de Medicina (UNIFESP/EPM) - Disciplina de Reumatologia, Rua dos Otonis, 863 - Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, CEP 04025-002, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate whether the combination of exercise and intra-articular injection (IAI) effectively improves pain, function, and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) compared to any control group in the short, medium, and long term through a systematic review.

methodsA comprehensive search strategy was applied in the databases Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and PEDro. Inclusion criteria focused on randomized controlled trials examining the effects of exercise combined with IAI in patients with knee OA, with outcomes assessed at short-, medium-, and long-term follow-ups. The primary outcomes were pain and function. The quality of the evidence was evaluated using the GRADE system.

resultsEleven studies, comprising 802 participants, were included. All studies investigated the combination of IAI and exercise. A statistically significant difference in pain was observed: in the short and medium term, the Botulinum toxin IAI group demonstrated superior pain reduction compared to the Hyaluronic acid IAI group (MD -1.32, 95% CI -2.20 to -0.44 and MD -9.09, 95% CI -13.16 to -5.01, respectively). In the medium term, Saline IAI was more effective than Corticosteroid IAI (MD 1.99, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.90). Regarding function, Saline IAI outperformed IAI with any medication in the short term (MD 0.50, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.79). In terms of quality of life, the Corticosteroid IAI group demonstrated superior physical function and mental health outcomes compared to the Saline IAI group in the medium term (MD -0.43, 95% CI -0.77 to -0.08 and MD -0.38, 95% CI -0.76 to -0.01, respectively). In the long term, physical function improved more with IAI combined with exercise compared to exercise alone.

conclusionGiven the very low quality of the evidence, it is not possible to definitively conclude that the combination of IAI and exercise is more effective than IAI or exercise alone in patients with knee OA. Further high-quality studies are needed to establish more definitive conclusions. REGISTRATION: The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42021277729. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyHyaluronic AcidOsteoarthritis, KneeBotulinum Toxins, Type ACombined Modality TherapyHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeViscosupplementsBotulinum Toxins, Type AHyaluronic AcidViscosupplementsAgedArthralgiaExercise therapyInjections, Intra-articularOsteoarthritis, knee

Identifiers

PMID41373020
PMCPMC13472110

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.