Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41373291›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Advanced Computational Modeling and Machine Learning for Risk Stratification, Treatment Optimization, and Prognostic Forecasting in Appendiceal Neoplasms.

Jawad S Alnajjar, Faisal A Al-Harbi, Ahmed Khalifah Alsaif, Ghaida S Alabdulaaly, Omar K Aljubaili, Manal Alquaimi, Arwa F Alrasheed, Mohammed N AlAli, Maha A Alghamdi, Ahmed Y Azzam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jawad S AlnajjarCollege of Medicine, King Faisal University, Hofuf 31982, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0006-0327-1764
Faisal A Al-HarbiCollege of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed Khalifah AlsaifCollege of Medicine, Al-Rayan National Colleges, Al-Madinah 42541, Saudi Arabia.
Ghaida S AlabdulaalyCollege of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0009-9609-0779
Omar K AljubailiCollege of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia.
Manal AlquaimiDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Faisal University, Hofuf 31982, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8788-5619
Arwa F AlrasheedDepartment of Surgery, Prince Mohammed bin Abdulaziz Hospital, Ministry of Health, Riyadh 12233, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0003-8915-2296
Mohammed N AlAliDepartment of Surgery, Prince Mohammed bin Abdulaziz Hospital, Ministry of Health, Riyadh 12233, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9011-7357
Maha A AlghamdiDepartment of General Surgery, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-1306-9616
Ahmed Y AzzamASIDE Healthcare, Lewes, DE 19958, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4256-0159

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAppendiceal neoplasms account for less than 1% of gastrointestinal cancers but are increasing in incidence worldwide. Their marked histological variations and differences create multiple challenges for prognosis and management planning, as current staging systems are limited in certain aspects for capturing the entire disease complexity.

methodsWe synthesized data from 18 large observational studies, including 67,001 patients diagnosed between 1973 and 2024. Using advanced computational modeling, we combined multiple statistical methods and machine learning techniques to improve risk stratification, survival prediction, treatment optimization, and forecasting. A novel overlap-aware weighting methodology was applied to prevent double-counting across overlapping registries.

resultsOur multi-dimensional risk model outperformed TNM staging (C-index 0.758 vs. 0.689), identifying five prognostic groups with five-year overall survival ranging from 88.7% (low-risk neuroendocrine tumors (NETs)) to 27.3% (high-risk signet-ring cell carcinomas (SRCC)). Hierarchical survival analysis demonstrated marked variation across histological variants, with goblet cell adenocarcinoma showing the most favorable outcomes. Causal inference confirmed the survival benefit of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in stage IV disease (five-year overall survival (OS) 87.4%) and highlighted disparities in outcomes by race and institutional volume. Time-series forecasting projected a 25% to 50% increase in incidence by 2030, highlighting the growing risk of global burden.

conclusionsBy integrating multi-database evidence with advanced modeling and statistical methodologies, our findings demonstrate valuable insights and implications for individualized prognosis, better management decision-making, and health system planning. Our proposed approach and demonstrated methodologies are warranting better progression and advancements in precision oncology and utilization of computational modeling techniques in big data as well as digital health progression landscape.

Indexed as

appendiceal neoplasmshyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapymachine learningrisk stratificationsurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID41373291
PMCPMC12692461

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.