Nutrition and Hydration at the End of Life in Intensive Care and General End-of-Life Care Settings: Balancing Clinical Evidence, Patient-Centered Care, and Ethical and Legal Principles-A Narrative Review.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Perceptions of Artificial Nutrition and Hydration at the End of Life Among Healthcare Professionals, Medical Students, and Lay Respondents: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Survey.Nutrients · 2026
   Article
2. Comparison of the predictive value of NUTRIC and modified NUTRIC scores for ICU mortality in patients with sepsis: a single-center prospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026
   Article
3. A Nomogram for Early Prediction of Inflammation, Catabolism, and Immunosuppression Syndrome in Critically Ill Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as