ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Advances in Titanium-Based Biomaterial for Human Bone Scaffolds: Narrative Review on Design, Fabrication, Surface Engineering, Implantation, and Biological Evaluation.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing demand for reliable orthopedic implants has driven extensive research into biomaterials and metal alloys for the development of bone scaffolds. This review summarizes current progress in improving scaffold performance by optimizing mechanical strength, biocompatibility, and bone integration. Key studies on material choice, modeling methods, manufacturing techniques, and surface treatments are discussed, with a special focus on titanium-based alloys due to their favorable mechanical and biological properties. Computational tools, particularly finite element modeling, are increasingly used alongside experimental findings to illustrate mechanical behavior and to guide design of structures that more closely resemble natural bone. Both additive and traditional manufacturing routes are considered, emphasizing how porosity, geometry, and fabrication parameters affect mechanical stability and tissue response. Surface modification approaches, both physical and chemical can enhance cell attachment and antimicrobial function. Overall, this paper shows how combining materials science, mechanical analysis, and biological testing helps develop bone scaffolds that offer durable mechanical support and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.