Evidence mapPaperPMID 41374372Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Modeling Working Memory in Neurodegeneration: A Focus on EEG Methods.

Yuliya Komarova, Alexander Zakharov, Mariya Sergeeva, Natalia Romanchuk, Tatyana Vladimirova, Igor Shirolapov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuliya KomarovaNeurosciences Research Institute, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Samara State Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 443099 Samara, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3435-1477
Alexander ZakharovNeurosciences Research Institute, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Samara State Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 443099 Samara, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1709-6195
Mariya SergeevaNeurosciences Research Institute, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Samara State Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 443099 Samara, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0926-8551
Natalia RomanchukNeurosciences Research Institute, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Samara State Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 443099 Samara, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3522-6803
Tatyana VladimirovaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology n.a. Academician I.B. Soldatov, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Samara State Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 443099 Samara, Russia.
Igor ShirolapovNeurosciences Research Institute, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Samara State Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 443099 Samara, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7670-6566

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory is one of the most vulnerable cognitive domains in neurodegenerative diseases. According to the World Health Organization, around 55 million people worldwide were living with dementia in 2021, a number projected to exceed 150 million by 2050. Impairments in working memory occur in 80-90% of patients with Alzheimer's disease, 40-60% with Parkinson's disease, and about 50% with frontotemporal dementia. These deficits include reduced information capacity, slower response times, increased errors in manipulation, and difficulties in maintaining information, making them sensitive indicators of progressive decline. This review aims to systematize current approaches to modeling working memory phenotypes using electroencephalography (EEG). It highlights experimental paradigms applied to probe working memory, methods of EEG signal processing and analysis, and the integration of machine learning and neural network models. Particular emphasis is placed on studies achieving high diagnostic accuracy, with classification rates of 85-90% when distinguishing patients with neurodegeneration from healthy participants. Limitations of existing methods, especially EEG variability, are considered. The review concludes by outlining future directions: integration of multimodal EEG data, application of artificial intelligence, and development of digital cognitive biomarkers for hybrid models capable of predicting cognitive decline and advancing clinical translation.

Indexed as

electroencephalographymachine learningmild cognitive impairmentneurodegenerationworking memory

Identifiers

PMID41374372
PMCPMC12691187

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.