ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Modeling Working Memory in Neurodegeneration: A Focus on EEG Methods.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-Entropy Feature Concatenation for Data-Efficient Cross-Subject Classification of Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia from Single-Channel EEG.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Working memory is one of the most vulnerable cognitive domains in neurodegenerative diseases. According to the World Health Organization, around 55 million people worldwide were living with dementia in 2021, a number projected to exceed 150 million by 2050. Impairments in working memory occur in 80-90% of patients with Alzheimer's disease, 40-60% with Parkinson's disease, and about 50% with frontotemporal dementia. These deficits include reduced information capacity, slower response times, increased errors in manipulation, and difficulties in maintaining information, making them sensitive indicators of progressive decline. This review aims to systematize current approaches to modeling working memory phenotypes using electroencephalography (EEG). It highlights experimental paradigms applied to probe working memory, methods of EEG signal processing and analysis, and the integration of machine learning and neural network models. Particular emphasis is placed on studies achieving high diagnostic accuracy, with classification rates of 85-90% when distinguishing patients with neurodegeneration from healthy participants. Limitations of existing methods, especially EEG variability, are considered. The review concludes by outlining future directions: integration of multimodal EEG data, application of artificial intelligence, and development of digital cognitive biomarkers for hybrid models capable of predicting cognitive decline and advancing clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.