ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Multimodality Imaging in Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Can Echocardiography Learn from Cardiac Magnetic Resonance?
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a distinctive and often under-recognized variant of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, characterized by predominant thickening of the apical segments of the left ventricle. Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging represent the two principal modalities for diagnosis and morphological assessment. While transthoracic echocardiography remains the first-line imaging technique, it may underestimate apical involvement, particularly when image foreshortening or poor endocardial/epicardial delineation occurs. Cardiac magnetic resonance has become the reference standard for defining apical morphology, quantifying hypertrophy, and characterizing myocardial tissue and perfusion. Beyond its diagnostic role, magnetic resonance serves as a research platform for the identification of new apical-centric criteria which, after appropriate validation, may be translated into echocardiographic practice. Echocardiography, however, retains unique strengths through its real-time evaluation of cardiac dynamics, ready-to-use approach to diastolic function assessment, and its ability to identify subtle apical or para-apical obstructive gradients that may raise the initial diagnostic suspicion. This review underscores the complementary roles of the two modalities and the multiple domains in which transthoracic echocardiography can derive substantial methodological and conceptual benefit from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, both in imaging methodology and in the refinement of diagnostic evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.