Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41374669›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Machine Learning for Sensor Analytics: A Comprehensive Review and Benchmark of Boosting Algorithms in Healthcare, Environmental, and Energy Applications.

Yifan Xie, Sai Pranay Tummala

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yifan XieDepartment of Decision Sciences and Marketing, Adelphi University, 1 South Avenue, Garden City, NY 11530, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-4005-5116
Sai Pranay TummalaDepartment of Decision Sciences and Marketing, Adelphi University, 1 South Avenue, Garden City, NY 11530, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensor networks generate high-dimensional temporally dependent data across healthcare, environmental monitoring, and energy management, which demands robust machine learning for reliable forecasting. While gradient boosting methods have emerged as powerful tools for sensor-based regression, systematic evaluation under realistic deployment conditions remains limited. This work provides a comprehensive review and empirical benchmark of boosting algorithms spanning classical methods (AdaBoost and GBM), modern gradient boosting frameworks (XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost), and adaptive extensions for streaming data and hybrid architectures. We conduct rigorous cross-domain evaluation on continuous glucose monitoring, urban air-quality forecasting, and building-energy prediction, assessing not only predictive accuracy but also robustness under sensor degradation, temporal generalization through proper time-series validation, feature-importance stability, and computational efficiency. Our analysis reveals fundamental trade-offs challenging conventional assumptions. Algorithmic sophistication yields diminishing returns when intrinsic predictability collapses due to exogenous forcing. Random cross-validation (CV) systematically overestimates performance through temporal leakage, with magnitudes varying substantially across domains. Calibration drift emerges as the dominant failure mode, causing catastrophic degradation across all the static models regardless of sophistication. Importantly, feature-importance stability does not guarantee predictive reliability. We synthesize the findings into actionable guidelines for algorithm selection, hyperparameter configuration, and deployment strategies while identifying critical open challenges, including uncertainty quantification, physics-informed architectures, and privacy-preserving distributed learning.

Indexed as

CatBoosthealthcare monitoringIoT sensor analyticsLightGBMtemporal robustnesstime-series forecastingXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID41374669
PMCPMC12694449

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.