ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Machine Learning for Sensor Analytics: A Comprehensive Review and Benchmark of Boosting Algorithms in Healthcare, Environmental, and Energy Applications.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bias Calibration for Semi-Supervised Continual Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Dietary branched-chain amino acids intake in relation to general and central obesity among Chinese children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sensor networks generate high-dimensional temporally dependent data across healthcare, environmental monitoring, and energy management, which demands robust machine learning for reliable forecasting. While gradient boosting methods have emerged as powerful tools for sensor-based regression, systematic evaluation under realistic deployment conditions remains limited. This work provides a comprehensive review and empirical benchmark of boosting algorithms spanning classical methods (AdaBoost and GBM), modern gradient boosting frameworks (XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost), and adaptive extensions for streaming data and hybrid architectures. We conduct rigorous cross-domain evaluation on continuous glucose monitoring, urban air-quality forecasting, and building-energy prediction, assessing not only predictive accuracy but also robustness under sensor degradation, temporal generalization through proper time-series validation, feature-importance stability, and computational efficiency. Our analysis reveals fundamental trade-offs challenging conventional assumptions. Algorithmic sophistication yields diminishing returns when intrinsic predictability collapses due to exogenous forcing. Random cross-validation (CV) systematically overestimates performance through temporal leakage, with magnitudes varying substantially across domains. Calibration drift emerges as the dominant failure mode, causing catastrophic degradation across all the static models regardless of sophistication. Importantly, feature-importance stability does not guarantee predictive reliability. We synthesize the findings into actionable guidelines for algorithm selection, hyperparameter configuration, and deployment strategies while identifying critical open challenges, including uncertainty quantification, physics-informed architectures, and privacy-preserving distributed learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.