ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Intraocular Cytokine Level Prediction from Fundus Images and Optical Coherence Tomography.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The relationship between retinal images and intraocular cytokine profiles remains largely unexplored, and no prior work has systematically compared fundus- and OCT-based deep learning models for cytokine prediction. We aimed to predict intraocular cytokine concentrations using color fundus photographs (CFP) and retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) with deep learning. Our pipeline consisted of image preprocessing, convolutional neural network-based feature extraction, and regression modeling for each cytokine. Deep learning was implemented using AutoGluon, which automatically explored multiple architectures and converged on ResNet18, reflecting the small dataset size. Four approaches were tested: (1) CFP alone, (2) CFP plus demographic/clinical features, (3) OCT alone, and (4) OCT plus these features. Prediction performance was defined as the mean coefficient of determination (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.