Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41374763›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Multifractal Cascade Modeling Reveals Fundamental Limits of Current Neuroimaging Strategies.

Madhur Mangalam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Madhur MangalamDepartment of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6369-0414

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging assumes spatial and temporal uniformity, yet brain activity exhibits a multifractal cascade structure with intermittent bursts and long-range dependencies. We use controlled simulations to test how well standard sampling strategies (random, grid-based, hierarchical; N = 10-2000 sensors) recover statistical properties-mean, variability, burstiness, and fractal dimension-from synthetic multifractal brain fields. Estimation errors deviate substantially from the classical N-1/2 scaling expected under independent sampling. For higher-order statistics like burstiness, error reduction is remarkably flat in log-log space: orders-of-magnitude increases in sensor density yield virtually no improvement. Grid sampling performs best for fractal dimension at high densities; hierarchical sampling is more stable for burstiness. These results indicate that current neuroimaging fundamentally underestimates brain complexity and variability, with major implications for interpreting both healthy and pathological brain function.

Indexed as

BrainFractalsNeuroimagingAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansbrain dynamicsfractal dimensionhierarchical samplingmultifractal cascadeneuroimaging samplingscale-invariance

Identifiers

PMID41374763
PMCPMC12694682

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.