Evidence mapPaperPMID 41375436Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Comparative Effects of

Hanan Al-Khalaifah, Sania Satti, Rasha Alonaizan, Shabana Naz, Sajida Arooj, Azka Haseeb, Rifat Ullah Khan, Ala Abudabos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hanan Al-KhalaifahEnvironment and Life Sciences Research Center, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Safat 13109, Kuwait.ORCID 0000-0002-1696-562X
Sania SattiDepartment of Zoology, Government College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.
Rasha AlonaizanDepartment of Zoology, College of Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0005-7312-309X
Shabana NazDepartment of Zoology, Government College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-3603-9850
Sajida AroojDepartment of Zoology, Government College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.
Azka HaseebDepartment of Zoology, Government College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.
Rifat Ullah KhanPhysiology Lab, College of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar 25100, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-0924-0479
Ala AbudabosDepartment of Food and Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN 37209, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7998-0344

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of selenium on poultry health and reproduction have been extensively studied using inorganic sodium selenite (SS). However, limited research has been done on organic selenium nanoparticles (Se-NPs). This study aimed to compare Se-NPs and SS on productivity, egg quality, reproductive performance, and male sexual behavior in Japanese quails. A total of 480 quails (8 weeks old) were assigned to 5 different experimental groups (96 birds in each group) with six replicates (pens) sex ratio 1 male: 3 females. One group was designated as control (fed by basal diet), whereas two groups were fed with different levels of Se-NPs (0.2 mg/kg and 0.4 mg/kg), and two groups with SS (0.2 mg/kg and 0.4 mg/kg). The trial lasted for 9 weeks. The highest productive performance was observed in quails supplemented with 0.4 mg/kg Se-NPs (

Indexed as

Japanese quailreproductive performanceselenium nanoparticlessexual behaviorsodium selenite

Identifiers

PMID41375436
PMCPMC12691470

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.