Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41375525›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Definition of Meat Quality Across Different Cattle Breeds.

Beniamino T Cenci-Goga, Egidia Costanzi, Francesca Blasi, Federica Ianni, Marco Tassinari, Claudio Truzzi, Musafiri Karama, Saeed El-Ashram, Cristina Saraiva, Marcelo Martínez-Barbitta and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Beniamino T Cenci-GogaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, 06126 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3993-6258
Egidia CostanziDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, 06126 Perugia, Italy.
Francesca BlasiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Perugia, 06126 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1902-2686
Federica IanniDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Perugia, 06126 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4293-3100
Marco TassinariDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3339-5067
Claudio TruzziMETRO Italia S.p.A., 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Musafiri KaramaDepartment of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, Pretoria 0110, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-6197-5309
Saeed El-AshramDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh 33516, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-0389-1980
Cristina SaraivaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, School of Agrarian and Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1657-0684
Marcelo Martínez-BarbittaSistema Reproductivo Veterinario Integral Uruguay, Luis Alberto de Herrera 1154, Nueva Helvecia 70300, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0001-6524-8929
Juan García-DíezDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, School of Agrarian and Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6930-0728
Massimo ZeraniDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, 06126 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2476-5097
Gabriella GuelfiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, 06126 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3695-9275
Margherita MaranesiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, 06126 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1727-4118
Luca GrispoldiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, 06126 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6887-3383
Lina CossignaniDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Perugia, 06126 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3433-604X

Funding

NextGenerationEU under the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR) National Inno-vation Ecosystem grant ECS00000041 - VITALITY ECS00000041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of cattle breed on key quality attributes-color, marbling, and tenderness-central to consumer choice. Six different bovine breeds were taken into consideration: German Red Pied, Piemontese, Chianina, Angus, Holstein, and a Polish crossbreed. The muscle taken into consideration was the Longissimus thoracis et lumborum. Colorimetric assessments, marbling evaluations, fatty acid profiling, and tenderness measurements were conducted on meat cuts from each breed. The results revealed that Chianina, Holstein, and the Polish crossbreed exhibited distinct color characteristics, with Chianina displaying notably brighter meat. Angus emerged as the most marbled breed, while Chianina and Piemontese showed lower marbling. Total lipid content was correlated with visible marbling. Tenderness assessments identified Angus and Holstein as the most tender breeds. The study's findings contribute to a proposed grading scale for color, marbling, and tenderness, offering potential labeling infographics to assist consumers in making informed choices based on individual preferences and needs. These insights underscore the importance of breed-specific information on labels to enhance consumer understanding and facilitate more informed purchasing decisions.

Indexed as

cattle breedsconsumer choicelabeling infographicsmeat quality

Identifiers

PMID41375525
PMCPMC12691018

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.