ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Parallel Pathways, Divergent Outcomes: Adipose Tissue-Neural Crosstalk in Depression and Obesity.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of neurofilament light chain, CXCL9, IL-6, and TNFRSF11B with intrinsic capacity in community-dwelling older adults.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Adipose Tissue Plasticity and Adipogenesis: From Cellular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Targets in Obesity.Current obesity reports · 2026Review
- Blood-brain barrier permeability of adipokines and myokines.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2026Article
- Leptin Receptor b (LEPRb) Mutations Disrupt Hypothalamic Control of the Reproductive Axis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Virtual reality-based stress paradigms and early adversity: a scoping review of mechanisms and stress-response systems.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depression and obesity are amongst the most serious global health challenges. Each of them is associated with high morbidity, chronicity, and socioeconomic burden. Increasing evidence suggests that these conditions are not merely comorbid but share convergent biological pathways (e.g., hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysregulation, chronic inflammation, gut dysbiosis, and mitochondrial dysfunction). All these components contribute together to the development and persistence of depressive symptoms as well as to an increase in adiposity. Within this framework, adipose tissue has emerged as an essential endocrine organ that has a deep impact on neuroimmune signalling and mood regulation through its secreted molecules, such as leptin, adiponectin, resistin, omentin, apelin, chemerin, and visfatin. The current management of depression involves a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach that includes pharmacological treatment and psychotherapeutic support, alongside lifestyle changes. Here we highlight the molecular crosstalk between adipose tissue and the brain, summarising the evidence of adipokines' dysregulation role in connecting metabolic dysfunction to depressive neurobiology. By integrating metabolic, immunological, and neuroendocrine perspectives, this narrative review underscores the need to reconceptualise depression as an immunometabolic disorder. Understanding adipokine-mediated pathways may reveal new biomarkers and therapeutic targets, fostering interdisciplinary approaches. This would allow for the development of new treatment strategies, which include recombinant adipokines, anti-inflammatory agents, and microbial modulation. These new strategies might provide a significant benefit in selected patients, in addition to conventional antidepressants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.