Evidence mapPaperPMID 41375675Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

A Novel Protocol for Feasibility and Safety in Early Discharge with ACS.

Karim Jamhour-Chelh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Karim Jamhour-ChelhInterventional Cardiology Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4181-6914

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute coronary syndrome is the primary reason for admission to cardiology services and involves significant resource consumption. Currently, low-risk patients are recommended for discharge within the first 48-72 h, enabling early initiation of cardiac rehabilitation with proper follow-up. This is crucial not only as an efficiency marker but also because current evidence has shown it to be a safe and feasible strategy. Thus, this work aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current evidence on early discharge in acute coronary syndrome and propose a new, intuitive, objective, and easy-to-use tool: the LATE2ACS protocol. This is a narrative, hypothesis-generating review; LATE2ACS is presented as a preliminary, exploratory checklist rather than a definitive or implementable score. Its added value lies in operationalizing post-PCI early discharge decision-making across ACS as a pragmatic bedside checklist that complements, rather than replaces, prognostic scores such as TIMI, GRACE, Zwolle, and CADILLAC.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromecardiac rehabilitationearly dischargeLATE2ACS protocolpercutaneous coronary interventionrisk stratificationTIMIZwolle index

Identifiers

PMID41375675
PMCPMC12693161

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.